Airwaves: March 9, 2012
        
  Stressing the Airwaves over Limbaughs Comments
  Or ... how national ratings are just made up
  
  Sigh.
  
  I detest writing about political talk radio. Not because I dont like
  it myself, though I am still on a pseudo-hiatus because I am still tired of
  the negativity and misleading statements that tend to permeate the genre. How
  many times can you -- depending on your views -- say Bush s***s or Obama
  s***s before it gets tiresome?
  
  No, I hate it because no matter what I write I get fan mail accusing me of
  -- from the very same column -- being a commie liberal and a right-wing fanatic.
  
  But the elephant is in the room, so perhaps I cant ignore it any
  longer. Therefore, I will ... ignore it.
  
  All right, not totally. In case you missed it in the newspaper, on radio, on
  television, or on the internet, popular conservative talker Rush Limbaugh said
  some things that -- especially out of context --sounded pretty bad about a
  young woman who was testifying before congress regarding birth control and
  health insurance. People protested, and advertisers began pulling out of the
  show. Limbaugh issued an apology that wasnt, and more advertisers pulled
  out. As of this writing, the number is up to eight.
  
  But thats not going to be my focus, nor am I going to comment on whether
  or not the statements were satire, funny, or appropriate. Ill leave that
  to people who actually heard the shows in question, and I did not. My focus
  comes from a link my friend Jeff Leonard sent me via Facebook of a story by
  Cenk Uygur in the online Huffington Post of March 5th entitled A
  Challenge to Rush: Prove Your Ratings.
  
  I am not a regular reader of The Huffington Post, but this story caught my
  eye. I had been researching the issue of national radio ratings recently myself,
  due to claims from some talk hosts and their followers regarding ratings. Uygur
  confirmed what I had found ... when it comes to national ratings, the numbers
  dont necessarily add up. The reason is simple: no one actually takes
  the time to accurately calculate the ratings or number of listeners on a national
  level.
  
  You could make an educated guess, I suppose. How accurate I will be is unknown.
  Limbaugh, for example, has a weekly audience of 15 million listeners. Sean
  Hannity has 14 million. Mark Levin, 8.5 million.
  
  Or maybe not. Those numbers listed come from Talkers Magazine, which says the
  numbers are estimates of national Arbitron numbers gathered directly
  by station reports and information provided by Arbitron and other sources as
  they relate to talk shows on news/talk-formatted stations. These figures are
  rough projections based upon a significant sample and do not represent exact
  Arbitron or any other ratings service totals.
  
  In other words, theyre (almost) made up. As one source said, Talkers
  is the only outlet that has ever tried to produce audience estimates. Its
  basically the same numbers every year, which means its either accurate,
  or its too high and the syndicators are happy with the exaggeration.
  
  Radio ratings giant Arbitron does not rate nationally, and the task of doing
  so is actually quite daunting. There are over 13,000 radio stations in the
  United States, over 4000 on the AM band alone where talk radio thrives. Talk
  programs can be found, however, even on stations that also play music. Or news.
  Or whatever. And on the internet. 
  
  With Arbitrons new (almost instant) Portable People Meter electronic
  ratings system, it would theoretically be possible to use a computer to tabulate
  the data, but theres a hitch: the PPM system is still not available in
  much of the United States; in 2010 the number of markets, roughly representing
  US cities, that had PPM was 48. That means most of the United States uses the
  old diary recall method of calculating ratings, based on time periods that
  dont necessarily match up with the hours a program airs and that use
  three-month averages in the final calculations. Try counting listeners based
  upon that data. No wonder only Talkers even tries.
  
  So will Limbaughs national ratings be affected by the recent controversy?
  Hard to say since no one really knows how many listeners he has anyway. Does
  that make him a paper tiger with no real influence as Uygur claims in the Huffington
  Post story? No. His ratings are good in the major cities he serves (including
  KFI here in Los Angeles). And I sincerely doubt that true-blue Limbaugh fans
  will be affected long-term by the event, if at all.
  
  But if Limbaugh continues to bleed advertisers, then there is a problem.
  The next few months may be critical to the future of Limbaugh ... and of political
  talk radio.
  
  ///
Copyright © 2012 Richard Wagoner and Los Angeles Newspaper Group.
To subscribe to The Daily Breeze, call (310) 540-5511